-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Improvement] -Add key info to Concierge to improve the New Expensify customer support experience #48529
Comments
Current assignee @VictoriaExpensify is eligible for the Bug assigner, not assigning anyone new. |
Proposal taken to WN - plenty of support for this and no pushback - https://expensify.slack.com/archives/CC7NECV4L/p1725492990710679 Looking for an engineer |
Ok this is actually going to go through a pre-design. Will start drafting this today |
Update Sept 11: |
Pre-design posted - https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C041MSTR8J1/p1726176871367989 |
@VictoriaExpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Pre-design has been wrapped up and I will start work finding an engineer to help implement |
Is this ready for the label? |
@VictoriaExpensify this issue was created 2 weeks ago. Are we close to a solution? Let's make sure we're treating this as a top priority. Don't hesitate to create a thread in #expensify-open-source to align faster in real time. Thanks! |
As discussed in the Pre-Design, this is what needs to be included in Concierge: 1. Onboarding tasks checklist when the customer replies to Concierge
The list should show the tasks a customer has completed, either through a check or a strikethrough - whichever solution is most simple to implement
For example, https://www.expensify.com/concierge/#/chat/20623863 is the main Concierge chat thread for [email protected]. This user replied in thread and a new chat was created https://www.expensify.com/concierge/#/chat/20623951 The new/sub chat thread (https://www.expensify.com/concierge/#/chat/20623951) should reference the original/main chat thread (https://www.expensify.com/concierge/#/chat/20623863) and vice-versa 4. Show reactions to Concierge messages
|
Triggered auto assignment to @marcaaron ( |
Chatted to @marcaaron - he's about to go OOO so isn't going to be able to get to this for several weeks. Adding the auto-assigner again |
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify Huh... This is 4 days overdue. Who can take care of this? |
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify 6 days overdue. This is scarier than being forced to listen to Vogon poetry! |
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify Now this issue is 8 days overdue. Are you sure this should be a Daily? Feel free to change it! |
I need to post a plan for the updated NVps. Haven't gotten around to it just yet but ill post it hopefully soon. |
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues! |
I'm just back from ooo but Chirag and I are catching up tomorrow to make a plan here |
Just adding a couple of items to this that have come up in Slack discussions, so we don't forget:
|
Chirag has tested the improvements and is working on implementing them - https://github.com/Expensify/Expensify/issues/459152 |
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick! |
Updates to the NVP are now in staging - woohoo! We are this 🤏 close to closing this out. Working on the final update |
@VictoriaExpensify @chiragsalian as per the accounting review section of the design doc this project was not eligible for cap sw time tracking. I cannot find the GH request to get it added to the cap sw sheet but can each of you please acknowledge that for future projects you will only action the cap sw request after the accounting review confirms it is eligible? |
Hi @nikihatesgh, sorry, I misunderstood the process. I got assigned this issue from Accounting and assumed that meant they were signing it off as a CAP issue. But now I see Trent's comments. I assume that GH was triggered because the project got added to the CAP spreadsheet at some point. Understood for future projects! |
The flow looks really good and, from testing, we are accurately capturing:
The scenarios that are not being captured are:
|
@chiragsalian, @VictoriaExpensify Eep! 4 days overdue now. Issues have feelings too... |
Not overdue, we're talking about it in chat.
imo, if we've solved for the majority of the cases we should close out this project and create separate GH issues for fine tuning the remaining items.
Yup both are shown. One is shown below the message and the other is in user info. |
And we're done! Our final wrap up post is here - https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C07NZ8B1VTQ/p1737685167553009 |
Proposal
Include thread and task details when a customer reaches out to Concierge from a threaded message
Problem
As discussed here and here, customers can now reach out to Concierge in task threads; however, Concierge does not have visibility of the tasks the user is writing in from. This means that Concierge lacks the context needed to support the customer; this is resulting in an awkard customer experience because Concierge needs to get clarification on details that the customer would expect us to be able to see.
Solution
When a customer reaches out to Concierge within a thread, make sure the responding agent has visibility of the information they need to assist that customer. This includes:
Design doc (Detailed portion currently in review)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: