[$250] Held expense is lost when individual partially pay the report

[IuliiaHerets]

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email [email protected] to request to join our Slack channel!

---

Version Number: 9.0.64-0
Reproducible in staging?: Y
Reproducible in production?: Y
If this was caught on HybridApp, is this reproducible on New Expensify Standalone?: Y
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: https://expensify.testrail.io/index.php?/tests/view/5238586&group_by=cases:section_id&group_id=309128&group_order=asc
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): [email protected]
Issue reported by: Applause Internal Team

Action Performed:

1. User A creates 2 expenses to User B
2. User B opens the report and hold the first expense
3. User B pay elsewhere partially the report
4. User A and User B go to the main chat

Expected Result:

Held expense should be present at the bottom of the page

Actual Result:

Held expense disappears for User A. User A must switch chats for the held expense to reappear

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

• Android: Standalone
• Android: HybridApp
• Android: mWeb Chrome
• iOS: Standalone
• iOS: HybridApp
• iOS: mWeb Safari
• MacOS: Chrome / Safari
• MacOS: Desktop

Screenshots/Videos

Bug6669335_1732012696842.Recording__4545.mp4

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit

• Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021859644564044218290
• Upwork Job ID: 1859644564044218290
• Last Price Increase: 2024-12-26

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @sonialiap (Bug), see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/14418 for more details. Please add this bug to a GH project, as outlined in the SO.

[melvin-bot]

Job added to Upwork: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~021859644564044218290

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to Contributor-plus team member for initial proposal review - @suneox (External)

[melvin-bot]

@suneox, @sonialiap Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[suneox]

We’re still looking for proposals

[jacobkim9881]

It's not reproducible.

[suneox]

It's not reproducible.

@jacobkim9881 Thanks for your feedback.
This issue can not reproduce on latest staging so we can retest then close this issue

Screen.Recording.2024-11-26.at.22.16.52.mp4

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[jacobkim9881]

@suneox Thanks for reviewing. Let me check my solution.

[suneox]

The issue is not reproducible. Waiting for retest and close

[melvin-bot]

@suneox, @sonialiap Uh oh! This issue is overdue by 2 days. Don't forget to update your issues!

[sonialiap]

added the retest label

[sonialiap]

I'm OOO Dec 16-20 but I don't think this will need a BZ while I'm out so not adding a leave buddy

[shubham1206agra]

Internal issue as this requires Pusher updates to be sent correctly.

🎀👀🎀 C+ reviewed

[melvin-bot]

Triggered auto assignment to @thienlnam, see https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/7972 for more details.

[shubham1206agra]

@suneox Fastracked the review for you

[suneox]

@suneox Fastracked the review for you

I'd like to confirmed that this issue can reproducible at step 3.

Screen.Recording.2024-12-13.at.22.44.39.mp4

It doesn’t occur at step 4, so I think we should remove step 4 from the action performed.

Screen.Recording.2024-12-13.at.22.55.16.mp4

[melvin-bot]

@suneox @sonialiap @thienlnam this issue is now 4 weeks old, please consider:

• Finding a contributor to fix the bug
• Closing the issue if BZ has been unable to add the issue to a VIP or Wave project
• If you have any questions, don't hesitate to start a discussion in #expensify-open-source

Thanks!

[suneox]

We're still looking for proposals on this issue. I’ve posted it to Slack to get more attention

[melvin-bot]

@suneox, @sonialiap, @thienlnam Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[melvin-bot]

@suneox, @sonialiap, @thienlnam Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!

[mvtglobally]

Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (First week)

[sonialiap]

@suneox Shubham mentioned here #52764 (comment) that this may be internal, what do you think?

[suneox]

@suneox Shubham mentioned here #52764 (comment) that this may be internal, what do you think?

This issue is not reproducible during KI retests, so we can wait until next week to reassess.

[melvin-bot]

📣 It's been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

[mvtglobally]

Issue not reproducible during KI retests. (Second week)

[shubham1206agra]

@suneox Can we close this?

[suneox]

@suneox Can we close this?

Yes we can close this one

[melvin-bot]

@suneox, @sonialiap, @thienlnam Whoops! This issue is 2 days overdue. Let's get this updated quick!