-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 65
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Improve range split function and add unit tests #553
Open
289Adam289
wants to merge
7
commits into
Expensify:@Skalakid/fix-emoji-formatting
Choose a base branch
from
289Adam289:@289Adam289/improve-split-add-unit-tests
base: @Skalakid/fix-emoji-formatting
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
6fa4db9
Improve splitRangesOnEmojis complexity
289Adam289 3e83307
move splitRangesOnEmojis to separate file
289Adam289 8fe38f3
add tests
289Adam289 5383871
Merge branch '@Skalakid/fix-emoji-formatting' into @289Adam289/improv…
289Adam289 0d8327e
fix tests
289Adam289 cea5128
code formatting
289Adam289 b39723f
review suggestions
289Adam289 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
53 changes: 53 additions & 0 deletions
53
android/src/main/java/com/expensify/livemarkdown/RangeSplitter.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@ | ||
package com.expensify.livemarkdown; | ||
|
||
import androidx.annotation.NonNull; | ||
|
||
import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
|
||
public class RangeSplitter { | ||
public static ArrayList<MarkdownRange> splitRangesOnEmojis(@NonNull List<MarkdownRange> markdownRanges, @NonNull String type) { | ||
ArrayList<MarkdownRange> emojiRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
ArrayList<MarkdownRange> oldRanges = new ArrayList<>(markdownRanges); | ||
ArrayList<MarkdownRange> newRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
for (MarkdownRange range : oldRanges) { | ||
if (range.getType().equals("emoji")) { | ||
emojiRanges.add(range); | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
int i = 0; | ||
int j = 0; | ||
while (i < oldRanges.size()) { | ||
MarkdownRange currentRange = oldRanges.get(i); | ||
if (!currentRange.getType().equals(type)) { | ||
newRanges.add(currentRange); | ||
i += 1; | ||
continue; | ||
} | ||
|
||
// Iterate through all emoji ranges before the end of the current range, splitting the current range at each intersection. | ||
while (j < emojiRanges.size()) { | ||
MarkdownRange emojiRange = emojiRanges.get(j); | ||
if (emojiRange.getStart() > currentRange.getEnd()) { | ||
break; | ||
} | ||
|
||
int currentStart = currentRange.getStart(); | ||
int currentEnd = currentRange.getEnd(); | ||
int emojiStart = emojiRange.getStart(); | ||
int emojiEnd = emojiRange.getEnd(); | ||
if (emojiStart >= currentStart && emojiEnd <= currentEnd) { // Intersection | ||
MarkdownRange newRange = new MarkdownRange(currentRange.getType(), currentStart, emojiStart - currentStart, currentRange.getDepth()); | ||
currentRange = new MarkdownRange(currentRange.getType(), emojiEnd, currentEnd - emojiEnd, currentRange.getDepth()); | ||
|
||
newRanges.add(newRange); | ||
} | ||
j += 1; | ||
} | ||
newRanges.add(currentRange); | ||
i += 1; | ||
} | ||
return newRanges; | ||
} | ||
} |
81 changes: 81 additions & 0 deletions
81
android/src/test/java/com/expensify/livemarkdown/RangeSplitterTest.java
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@ | ||
package com.expensify.livemarkdown; | ||
|
||
import static com.expensify.livemarkdown.RangeSplitter.splitRangesOnEmojis; | ||
|
||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals; | ||
|
||
import org.junit.Test; | ||
|
||
import java.util.ArrayList; | ||
import java.util.Collections; | ||
import java.util.List; | ||
|
||
public class RangeSplitterTest { | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testNoOverlap() { | ||
List<MarkdownRange> markdownRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 10, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 12, 2, 1)); | ||
|
||
markdownRanges = splitRangesOnEmojis(markdownRanges, "strikethrough"); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(2, markdownRanges.size()); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 10, 1), markdownRanges.get(0)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 12, 2, 1), markdownRanges.get(1)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testOverlapDifferentType() { | ||
List<MarkdownRange> markdownRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 10, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 4, 1)); | ||
|
||
markdownRanges = splitRangesOnEmojis(markdownRanges, "italic"); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(2, markdownRanges.size()); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 10, 1), markdownRanges.get(0)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 4, 1), markdownRanges.get(1)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testSingleOverlap() { | ||
List<MarkdownRange> markdownRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 10, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 4, 1)); // This range should split the strikethrough range | ||
|
||
markdownRanges = splitRangesOnEmojis(markdownRanges, "strikethrough"); | ||
|
||
// Sort is needed because ranges may get mixed while splitting | ||
Collections.sort(markdownRanges, (r1, r2) -> Integer.compare(r1.getStart(), r2.getStart())); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(3, markdownRanges.size()); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 0, 3, 1), markdownRanges.get(0)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 4, 1), markdownRanges.get(1)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 7, 3, 1), markdownRanges.get(2)); | ||
} | ||
|
||
@Test | ||
public void testMultipleOverlapsMultipleTypes() { | ||
List<MarkdownRange> markdownRanges = new ArrayList<>(); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("italic", 0, 20, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 2, 12, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 1, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 8, 2, 1)); | ||
markdownRanges.add(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 22, 5, 1)); | ||
|
||
markdownRanges = splitRangesOnEmojis(markdownRanges, "strikethrough"); | ||
|
||
// Sort is needed because ranges may get mixed while splitting | ||
Collections.sort(markdownRanges, (r1, r2) -> Integer.compare(r1.getStart(), r2.getStart())); | ||
|
||
assertEquals(7, markdownRanges.size()); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("italic", 0, 20, 1), markdownRanges.get(0)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 2, 1, 1), markdownRanges.get(1)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 3, 1, 1), markdownRanges.get(2)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 4, 4, 1), markdownRanges.get(3)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("emoji", 8, 2, 1), markdownRanges.get(4)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 10, 4, 1), markdownRanges.get(5)); | ||
assertEquals(new MarkdownRange("strikethrough", 22, 5, 1), markdownRanges.get(6)); | ||
} | ||
} |
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is it sufficient to compare ranges only based on
start
?Is
splitRangesOnEmojis
deterministic?Do we really need to sort the ranges?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For the tests I wrote - I think so but in generality no.
It is.
splitRangesOnEmojis
does not guarantee any order of ranges. I've added sort so that tests work for different implementation of the method.