You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I compare the structure of the MD catalog (currently looking at WebGUI) with the MD concepts listed in D4.2, I notice divergences on data source. In D4.2 there's a flat list of concepts, in the WebGUI these are split into
General
Assets
Organizations
Related to this is the field Source. Looking at the description, I'm getting the impression that this field started out as a heading as it describes multiple components:
Origin of data (institution, etc.) including download URL / email as appropriate
Looking at the other fields under Data source in D4.2, I get the impression that Source is a duplicate of Documentation link
This makes it very hard to understand what fields from D4.2 correspond to which sections of the WebGUI, makes it that much harder to provide descriptive texts in the Sheet created by S4E
Could D4.2 be restructured to align with what we're actually doing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
When I compare the structure of the MD catalog (currently looking at WebGUI) with the MD concepts listed in D4.2, I notice divergences on data source. In D4.2 there's a flat list of concepts, in the WebGUI these are split into
Related to this is the field
Source
. Looking at the description, I'm getting the impression that this field started out as a heading as it describes multiple components:Origin of data (institution, etc.) including download URL / email as appropriate
Looking at the other fields under Data source in D4.2, I get the impression that
Source
is a duplicate ofDocumentation link
This makes it very hard to understand what fields from D4.2 correspond to which sections of the WebGUI, makes it that much harder to provide descriptive texts in the Sheet created by S4E
Could D4.2 be restructured to align with what we're actually doing?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: