You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the same spirit as we teach students how to do error-propagation for experiments they do, we should find a way to at least estimate the uncertainties of operations performed.
We might want to have a look at unumpy
A --with-error-propagation option would be the best possible outcome.
In the meantime we should do our best to make people aware of the numerical limitations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kreczko
changed the title
Tracking the accuracy of operations
Tracking the accuracy/uncertainty of operations
Jan 21, 2022
Recent adjustments to the codebase unearthed some uncertainties that we need to find a way to keep track off.
The current example is
ak.sum
vsnp.sum
where the result is dependent on the parameters used (see scikit-hep/awkward#1241).I've found some old numpy discussions but also a related project - accupy.
In the same spirit as we teach students how to do error-propagation for experiments they do, we should find a way to at least estimate the uncertainties of operations performed.
We might want to have a look at
unumpy
A
--with-error-propagation
option would be the best possible outcome.In the meantime we should do our best to make people aware of the numerical limitations.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: