BFD session on Loopback interfaces #15388
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
I think only multihop should work, because your ttl is decremented twice |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
BFD packets were dropped due to iptables rule set for loopback IPs. After updating iptable rules, BFD sessions are up between loopback IPs. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi,
Trying to bring up a BFD session between Loopback address configured on directly connected nodes.
NODE1(Loopback-10.1.0.32, BFD Active mode)<--->NODE2(Loopback 10.2.0.1, BFD Passive mode)
Both the Loopback addresses are reachable via static routes configured on both the nodes.
NODE1# show bfd peers
BFD Peers:
peer 10.2.0.1 local-address 10.1.0.32 vrf default
ID: 1532873704
Remote ID: 0
Active mode
Status: down
NODE1# show interface Loopback0
Interface Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up
inet 10.1.0.32/32 unnumbered
NODE2# show bfd peers
BFD Peers:
peer 10.1.0.32 local-address 10.2.0.1 vrf default
ID: 4130411947
Remote ID: 0
Passive mode
Status: down
NODE2# show interface Loopback0
Interface Loopback0 is up, line protocol is up
inet 10.2.0.1/32 unnumbered
inet6 fe80::2064:96ff:fe4f:564/64
FRRouting 8.5.1 on both the nodes
Tcpdump on NODE2 shows that BFD packets are received from NODE1, but BFDD is not receiving those packets. Zebra and BFD debugs didn't show any errors.
When I configure the BFD sessions using directly connected interface address, sessions are up. Problem seems to be with loopback address. If anyone have tried the same, please provide some details.
Thanks,
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions