Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

tests: Verify PIM RP on an FHR #13619

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

routingrocks
Copy link
Contributor

Test PIM on a multi-VRF setup where the FHR is the RP. Verify the pimreg interface in VRF blue and red,
and multicast stream from H1 goes out on both the VRFs. Basically, this test verifies RP when the FHR is directly connected to the sender.

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Varatharaj [email protected]

@frrbot frrbot bot added the tests Topotests, make check, etc label May 28, 2023
@routingrocks
Copy link
Contributor Author

Log:
`~/C/U/f/t/t/pim_vrf_fhr_rp (pim_sock_topotests)> sudo -E pytest ./pim_vrf_fhr_rp.py
[sudo] password for r:
===================================================== test session starts ======================================================
platform linux -- Python 3.8.10, pytest-7.1.1, pluggy-1.0.0
rootdir: /home/r/CODE/UPSTREAM/frr/tests/topotests, configfile: pytest.ini
plugins: xdist-3.1.0
collected 5 items

pim_vrf_fhr_rp.py ..... [100%]

--------------------------------------- generated xml file: /tmp/topotests/topotests.xml ---------------------------------------
====================================================== 5 passed in 23.66s ======================================================`

@NetDEF-CI
Copy link
Collaborator

Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFUL

Congratulations, this patch passed basic tests

Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System

CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-PULLREQ2-11787/

This is a comment from an automated CI system.
For questions and feedback in regards to this CI system, please feel free to email
Martin Winter - mwinter (at) opensourcerouting.org.

@mobash-rasool mobash-rasool self-requested a review May 30, 2023 15:23
@mobash-rasool
Copy link
Contributor

Will wait for you to add the test scenario mentioned over the meeting.

@routingrocks routingrocks marked this pull request as draft August 10, 2023 21:09
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 7, 2024

This PR is stale because it has been open 180 days with no activity. Comment or remove the autoclose label in order to avoid having this PR closed.

@routingrocks
Copy link
Contributor Author

will take care in sometime

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the autoclose label Feb 8, 2024
Test PIM on a multi-VRF setup where the FHR is the RP.
Verify the pimreg interface in VRF blue and red,
and multicast stream from H1 goes out on both the VRFs.
Basically, this test verifies RP when the FHR is directly
connected to the sender.

Signed-off-by: Rajesh Varatharaj <[email protected]>
@github-actions github-actions bot added size/L and removed size/XL labels Dec 16, 2024
@routingrocks routingrocks marked this pull request as ready for review December 16, 2024 18:30
@Jafaral
Copy link
Member

Jafaral commented Dec 16, 2024

@routingrocks, we started doing unified configs since 10.0, is it possible to switch to using frr.conf instead of separate per daemon configs?. Once you have frr.conf you can load them like this:

https://github.com/FRRouting/frr/blob/master/tests/topotests/pim_cand_rp_bsr/test_pim_cand_rp_bsr.py#L120

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
master size/L tests Topotests, make check, etc
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants