-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bgpd: Allow aspath prepending for default-originate with route-maps #8860
bgpd: Allow aspath prepending for default-originate with route-maps #8860
Conversation
Outdated results 💚Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1: Failed (click for details)Topology Test Results are at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-TP1U1804AMD64-19621/test Topology Tests failed for Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 amd64 part 1:
see full log at https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-19621/artifact/TP1U1804AMD64/ErrorLog/log_topotests.txt Successful on other platforms/tests
|
1edaaf6
to
bc60e16
Compare
Outdated results 💚Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failed
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: FAILEDContinuous Integration Result: FAILEDSee below for issues. This is a comment from an automated CI system. Get source / Pull Request: SuccessfulBuilding Stage: SuccessfulBasic Tests: FailedTopotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: Failed (click for details)Topotests Ubuntu 18.04 arm8 part 9: No useful log foundSuccessful on other platforms/tests
|
The initial idea was to deny prepending and just use _self_. This patch at least allows prepending aspath with route-maps, but drops all non-self ASNs in the path. Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <[email protected]>
…ginate Signed-off-by: Donatas Abraitis <[email protected]>
bc60e16
to
cc54c07
Compare
💚 Basic BGPD CI results: SUCCESS, 0 tests failedResults table
For details, please contact louberger |
Continuous Integration Result: SUCCESSFULCongratulations, this patch passed basic tests Tested-by: NetDEF / OpenSourceRouting.org CI System CI System Testrun URL: https://ci1.netdef.org/browse/FRR-FRRPULLREQ-19757/ This is a comment from an automated CI system. |
This is not a bug fix. it looks like a feature. Why the backport label? |
Wasn't really sure about this, removing. |
@donaldsharp why isn't it a bugfix? Looking at the config posted in the linked issue – we allow creating a route-map with
And this config doesn't work without this fix. |
one can argue either way. But effectively we are adding new functionality. This is not fixing existing behavior as that we never said that this would work. |
For me, if we allow something to be configured then we say that it should work. Otherwise, why we allow this to be configured? :) |
Shouldn't this also be reflected on the 'show ip bgp neighbor ... advertised-routes' ?
Would currently result in...
While debug hints it is probably working.. 2024/10/10 14:37:03 BGP: [T5SJP-4SNA8] u4:s4 send UPDATE 0.0.0.0/0 nexthop 0.0.0.0, origin i, mp_nexthop ::, metric 123, path 65000 65000 65000 I see only 'show ip bgp' commands are tested? ~~ |
You can check using:
|
Closes #8840