Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SBS signatures choice #52

Open
N-TI opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

SBS signatures choice #52

N-TI opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@N-TI
Copy link

N-TI commented Sep 3, 2020

Hi,

I'm analyzing SBS signatures one tumor type (extract known mutational signatures). First, I did the fitting to search signatures with real contribution (I have extracted all the cosmic signatures in input_signatures parameter ).
However I found ambiguous results. For example, SBS3 doesn't appear as a signature with real contribution (very few samples present the SBS3 with low contribution) . However, when I choose some known signatures (8 or 10) and I include SBS3, I've got another totally different result: I have found that SBS3 has appeared in the most of samples with very high proportions.

As I'm beginner in signature analyses, my question is why I had two different results for the same samples just because I have changed the number of signatures to extract and how can I fix this problem?

Thank you!

@N-TI N-TI changed the title SBS SBS signatures choice Sep 3, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant