You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm analyzing SBS signatures one tumor type (extract known mutational signatures). First, I did the fitting to search signatures with real contribution (I have extracted all the cosmic signatures in input_signatures parameter ).
However I found ambiguous results. For example, SBS3 doesn't appear as a signature with real contribution (very few samples present the SBS3 with low contribution) . However, when I choose some known signatures (8 or 10) and I include SBS3, I've got another totally different result: I have found that SBS3 has appeared in the most of samples with very high proportions.
As I'm beginner in signature analyses, my question is why I had two different results for the same samples just because I have changed the number of signatures to extract and how can I fix this problem?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
N-TI
changed the title
SBS
SBS signatures choice
Sep 3, 2020
Hi,
I'm analyzing SBS signatures one tumor type (extract known mutational signatures). First, I did the fitting to search signatures with real contribution (I have extracted all the cosmic signatures in input_signatures parameter ).
However I found ambiguous results. For example, SBS3 doesn't appear as a signature with real contribution (very few samples present the SBS3 with low contribution) . However, when I choose some known signatures (8 or 10) and I include SBS3, I've got another totally different result: I have found that SBS3 has appeared in the most of samples with very high proportions.
As I'm beginner in signature analyses, my question is why I had two different results for the same samples just because I have changed the number of signatures to extract and how can I fix this problem?
Thank you!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: