Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
Hi! I would say highly impossible. The reason is that:
For Electron, the biggest concern is the huge binary. However, very few users care about that. And comparing Paperlib with other paper management tools such as Zotero, I believe that Paperlib is the smallest one. For CPU and RAM. I think there will be no big difference between Electron and Tauri as they are both based on browsers. As you know, there is no browser core in Tauri, which leads to compatibility issues; we cannot guarantee a consistent experience across every operating system's webview. For the tradeoff between compatibility/development vs binary size, we decide to choose the former. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I wonder if moving to Tauri instead of Electron is feasible. Electron is great but it produces huge binaries and it is heavy on RAM and CPU.
Tauri on the other hand is lightweight and produces substantially small binaries in comparison to Electron. That's because Tauri doesn't ship any browser runtime with the app as Electron ships Chromium with each app.
It's limiting in one case, compatibility with older platforms like Windows 7 that doesn't support the WebView Tauri is based on. Fortunately Tauri fixes that by allowing to build the app with the browser runtime as Electron does.
That said, what do you think about the idea.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions