Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature Request] arrange label and group compactly #633

Open
zhilongjia opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[Feature Request] arrange label and group compactly #633

zhilongjia opened this issue Dec 24, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
feature-request New feature request

Comments

@zhilongjia
Copy link

Describe your feature request
...
If paperlib could arrange all the labels compactly in the left panel (just like arranging the enclosed files line by line as a matrix), it would be convenient as there are so many labels if there are lots of papers. It also suits to the group tag.
image

Another point: showing the abstract on the right panel as well?

Lastly, I would like to say paperlib is wonderful! Two points!

  1. It could combine the chatglm-4-flash (freely) to summarize and tag papers.
  2. renaming papers quickly.
@zhilongjia zhilongjia added the feature-request New feature request label Dec 24, 2024
@GeoffreyChen777
Copy link
Member

Thanks.

  1. grid view for tags: doable.
  2. abstract: currently we can't. because we don't save abstract in the database. We scrape metadata from several databases. Some of them don't record abstract. If you wish to show abstract for some papers such as papers from arxiv.org, I would suggest developing an extension for that, just like how we show the citation count. https://github.com/Future-Scholars/paperlib-citation-count-extension

@zhilongjia
Copy link
Author

Thank you for your reply. I'm not familiar with typescript language, so I haven't been able to implement it recently. Sorry about this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature-request New feature request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants