-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
sse2neon - better machine support #59
Comments
@jschindehette @ajung123 Thoughts? |
the presence of |
It is. Are you suggesting something even more generic like this?
edit: I'm not sure if simply '1' is good enough there, or even if the syntax of this is correct now. |
I've seen this in cpuburn-neon recipe:
but now it is different in more recent releases of meta-openembedded (in warrior branch it is renamed to cpuburn-arm), which appears to follow your idea
you could also check the ne10 recipe |
It probably has to do with parsing vs. post-parsing (override syntax) as to how successful the in-line python actually is. So override syntax it is then? |
from my side... I would say so. it is already better than the current approach indeed |
I pushed zeus-next but it doesn't have much testing yet. The patch is d447444; need to propagate it through the rest of the branches. |
The
COMPATIBLE_MACHINE = "(arm|aarch64)"
usage in this recipe will not work for devices like the Ettus E310 since those values aren't in theMACHINEOVERRIDES
. I'm sure this extends to other machines as well. I'm open to other suggestions, but this would be more flexible since in those cases,OVERRIDES
will almost certainly havearm
oraarch64
in the list (otherwise the dependency chain for rh.DataConverter would not have reached over to those patches and dependencies lists):We would need to apply this as far back as rocko.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: