You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In GemStone 3.1 we have PortableStreams that are very compatible with the Pharo Streams, thus making it much easier to port these streams to GemStone ....
The porting task is much more difficult for GemStone2.4...
Along these lines I would be inclined to delete these classes on the gemstone2.4 branch (leaving them on the gemstone3.1 branch)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I may be mistaken but I think the image format classes are only used by
the ZnEasy class. And because of the nature of running multiple gems
behind apache or nginx the GzipStreams aren't very necessary/useful
anyway.
On 05/31/2012 09:47 AM, Dale Henrichs wrote:
In GemStone 3.1 we have PortableStreams that are very compatible with the Pharo Streams, thus making it much easier to port these streams to GemStone ....
The porting task is much more difficult for GemStone2.4...
Along these lines I would be inclined to delete these classes on the gemstone2.4 branch (leaving them on the gemstone3.1 branch)
In GemStone 3.1 we have PortableStreams that are very compatible with the Pharo Streams, thus making it much easier to port these streams to GemStone ....
The porting task is much more difficult for GemStone2.4...
Along these lines I would be inclined to delete these classes on the gemstone2.4 branch (leaving them on the gemstone3.1 branch)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: