You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In the Lanraragi web UI, opening an archive removes the "new" tag
in LRReader, it only appears to get removed when viewing the last page
LRReader's behavior requires you to read through the entire book (including credits pages and possible variant pages/no text versions which may be included) to clear the flag, which makes it kind of bad for the use case of "Show me stuff I haven't looked at".
If LRReader wants to have a better stance than the web UI that's fine, but I think comic rack's model is probably better:
If you complete the archive, it's marked as read
If you read more than 25% of the archive, it's marked as read
If you've read at least 10 pages, it's marked as read
These three checks catch all of the edge cases, like one page archives, small books, long books, etc. and cover the general intent of "I looked at this intentionally" without the overly aggressive behavior of marking them from a misclick.
Best case would be for this to be configurable between the current behavior, the web UI behavior, and the "smart" behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yup, this seems like a better way of handling it. The current logic somewhat matches Ichaival which is the android client but letting the user pick whatever they want is better, specially now that I have options to give to the user 👀
In the Lanraragi web UI, opening an archive removes the "new" tag
in LRReader, it only appears to get removed when viewing the last page
LRReader's behavior requires you to read through the entire book (including credits pages and possible variant pages/no text versions which may be included) to clear the flag, which makes it kind of bad for the use case of "Show me stuff I haven't looked at".
If LRReader wants to have a better stance than the web UI that's fine, but I think comic rack's model is probably better:
These three checks catch all of the edge cases, like one page archives, small books, long books, etc. and cover the general intent of "I looked at this intentionally" without the overly aggressive behavior of marking them from a misclick.
Best case would be for this to be configurable between the current behavior, the web UI behavior, and the "smart" behavior.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: