Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accuracy not Improving as in Paper Results #27

Open
meher-mankikar opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments
Open

Accuracy not Improving as in Paper Results #27

meher-mankikar opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@meher-mankikar
Copy link

Hello,
I cloned the repo and am running the training file, but my accuracy seems to be improving much slower than the results presented in the paper. Are there some hyperparameter settings that should be changed to reproduce your results? I have attached some partial training results I am getting right now.

Thank you for your help!
Screenshot 2024-05-02 at 3 16 49 PM

@Horea94
Copy link
Owner

Horea94 commented May 2, 2024

Did you download the repo for tensorflow 1.8 or the latest one?
Bear in mind that the results in the paper were recorded with certain hardware and a much older version of tensorflow. It is difficult to estimate how the newer versions affect the overall training process and you may have to perform some exploratory search in order to find the best hyper parameters.

@meher-mankikar
Copy link
Author

I was using the latest version for the results above. If using tf 1.8, were you using the code at image_classification_tf_1.8.0/network/fruit_train_net.py for training?
I was originally running image_classification/Fruits-360 CNN.py but I believe this is only compatible with tf 2.0?

@Horea94
Copy link
Owner

Horea94 commented May 2, 2024

Yes. However, that version is deprecated and I would still recommend using the one for tf 2.0 as it should achieve comparable performance even if the training progress differs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants