We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
One way to fix this in the short term is to look at the range in the values and see if they exceed 180 degrees, then shift all values accordingly.
This might be an issue for the mean, so it will have to be treated accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For now, visual inspection will show whether or not the distribution is close to uniform.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Image for example
864c559 sort-of fixes this. It's not great and probably not fully statistically correct, but it's better than what it was.
Ideally we need to start looking handling circularity directly within the QQ code.
No branches or pull requests
One way to fix this in the short term is to look at the range in the values and see if they exceed 180 degrees, then shift all values accordingly.
This might be an issue for the mean, so it will have to be treated accordingly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: