Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which Kyber OIDs should we use #48

Open
johngray-dev opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Which Kyber OIDs should we use #48

johngray-dev opened this issue Apr 26, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@johngray-dev
Copy link
Collaborator

We are at the point where there is interest in making use of Kyber. At the NCCoE they are looking at making use of our OID mapping table, and asked about what Kyber OIDs to use. It make sense for us to use Kyber OIDs. After speaking with a number of people, the following OIDS are being proposed:

kyber512 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.1
kyber768 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.2
kyber1024 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.3
kyber512_aes 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.4
kyber768_aes 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.5
kyber1024_aes 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.6

@johngray-dev
Copy link
Collaborator Author

We decided to use these ones for interoperability testing for now:

kyber512 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.1
kyber768 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.2
kyber1024 1.3.6.1.4.1.22554.5.6.3

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant