You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I attended Prof. Wieland's Advanced Studies Programme course in Monetary Policy at the IfW Kiel last week. During the course, when we talked about the MMB, we noticed that the US_CCTW10 model has what appears to be an incorrect value of the parameter omega.
Specifically, line 107 of the file static/mmci-cli/models/US_CCTW10/US_CCTW10.mod has the following:
omega=0.5;//.2651;
which should likely be
omega=0.2651;
instead. The paper for this model, Cogan et al. (2010), lists 0.2651 as the posterior mean for this parameter (p. 294, table A1).
References
Cogan, J.F., T. Cwik, J.B. Taylor and V. Wieland. 2010. "New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, pp. 281-295.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I attended Prof. Wieland's Advanced Studies Programme course in Monetary Policy at the IfW Kiel last week. During the course, when we talked about the MMB, we noticed that the
US_CCTW10
model has what appears to be an incorrect value of the parameter omega.Specifically, line 107 of the file
static/mmci-cli/models/US_CCTW10/US_CCTW10.mod
has the following:omega=0.5;//.2651;
which should likely be
omega=0.2651;
instead. The paper for this model, Cogan et al. (2010), lists 0.2651 as the posterior mean for this parameter (p. 294, table A1).
References
Cogan, J.F., T. Cwik, J.B. Taylor and V. Wieland. 2010. "New Keynesian versus Old Keynesian Government Spending Multipliers", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34, pp. 281-295.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: