Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request/Idea: Investigate status of Crossref Funder Registry, review alternatives for retrieving and recording funder metadata #9720

Closed
jggautier opened this issue Jul 19, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
Feature: Metadata UX & UI: Design This issue needs input on the design of the UI and from the product owner

Comments

@jggautier
Copy link
Contributor

jggautier commented Jul 19, 2023

During a recent NIH GREI meeting, John Chodacki at CDL mentioned that the Crossref Funder Registry is being deprecated. We should find out why and when and how this affects the work done recently to let users choose funder names from the Crossref Funder Registry (#9150).

@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Jul 26, 2023

Perhaps we could use ROR (Research Organization Registry) instead to look up funders. @qqmyers already did some great using ROR to look up Author Affiliation in this PR:

@jggautier
Copy link
Contributor Author

Right, yeah. Dryad let us know they're switching from Crossref Funder Registry to ROR for collecting funder names. And I'd guess that the NIH GREI ROR working group will be talking about using RORs for funders, too.

@pdurbin
Copy link
Member

pdurbin commented Sep 8, 2023

@pdurbin pdurbin added UX & UI: Design This issue needs input on the design of the UI and from the product owner and removed UI/UX: Design labels Oct 7, 2023
@cmbz
Copy link

cmbz commented Jan 30, 2024

2024/01/30
@jggautier Can this issue now be closed (because of GREI work), or is it still relevant and there is more work to do? (And if so, where is that work described and being tracked?)

@jggautier
Copy link
Contributor Author

jggautier commented Jan 30, 2024

Yeah, I think it can be be closed. During the prioritization meeting last week, @sbarbosadataverse said that it was decided to not use the Crossref Funder Registry and to use ROR instead. And during a ROR meeting today, folks from ROR said that coverage of Funder Registry entries in ROR was now over 95%, echoing what they shared in a blog post, which I think is pretty good evidence that ROR will be a great replacement.

@qqmyers worked on using the Funder Registry for the controlled vocabulary functionality that we were planning to use so that people adding funding metadata can choose funder names from the Funder Registry (#9150). We'll need to revisit that work, in addition to other plans that mention the Funder Registry, such as IQSS/dataverse-pm#19, and plans that come out of the research we're doing, being tracked in #10196 and #4859, to help us understand how to make the funder metadata that Dataverse collects and distributes more usable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature: Metadata UX & UI: Design This issue needs input on the design of the UI and from the product owner
Projects
Status: Done
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants