Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

random_ttn for site-indices with QNs #124

Open
b-kloss opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

random_ttn for site-indices with QNs #124

b-kloss opened this issue Jan 14, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@b-kloss
Copy link
Contributor

b-kloss commented Jan 14, 2024

With the upcoming support for QN indices and fermions in the TTN constructor #122, it would be nice allow for making a random TTN in a given quantum number sector (determined by an input state, passed e.g. as a function).

@b-kloss b-kloss changed the title randomTTN for site-indices with QNs is missing randomTTN for site-indices with QNs Jan 14, 2024
@b-kloss b-kloss changed the title randomTTN for site-indices with QNs randomTTN for site-indices with QNs Jan 14, 2024
@emstoudenmire
Copy link
Contributor

I've been wanting to improve the implementation of this for the QN case ever since support for QN conserving QR (and LQ) decomposition was added. It would be good to chat about the algorithm for this & could be ideal to add it to this package then "back port" the implementation to ITensors.jl afterward.

@mtfishman
Copy link
Member

Yeah, definitely something we need. Though it should be called random_ttn to follow the convention that only types (and constructors with the exact name of the type) are capitalized.

Also, a temporary workaround for constructing random TTN with bond dimension larger than one would be to apply a low-depth circuit of random 2-site unitary gates to a product state.

@mtfishman mtfishman changed the title randomTTN for site-indices with QNs random_ttn for site-indices with QNs Jan 16, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants