You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Let A be a Dedekind domain with field of fractions K, let L/K be a finite separable extension and let B be the integral closure of A in L.
If w is a finite place of L lying over v of K, then the map K -> L "obviously" extends to a map of completions K_v -> L_w. At the time of writing, Andrew Yang has reduced this claim to the assertion about the relationship between the v-adic and w-adic valuations on K, which should easily follow from IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.valuation_comap. The goal of this issue is to check this, i.e. to assume valuation_comap and fill in the sorry in adicCompletion_comap_ringHom in the file FLT.DededkindDomain.FiniteAdeleRing.BaseChange. It should hopefully be a relatively straightforward wrestle with WithZero (Multiplicative ℤ).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Let A be a Dedekind domain with field of fractions K, let L/K be a finite separable extension and let B be the integral closure of A in L.
If w is a finite place of L lying over v of K, then the map K -> L "obviously" extends to a map of completions K_v -> L_w. At the time of writing, Andrew Yang has reduced this claim to the assertion about the relationship between the v-adic and w-adic valuations on K, which should easily follow from
IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.valuation_comap
. The goal of this issue is to check this, i.e. to assumevaluation_comap
and fill in the sorry inadicCompletion_comap_ringHom
in the fileFLT.DededkindDomain.FiniteAdeleRing.BaseChange
. It should hopefully be a relatively straightforward wrestle withWithZero (Multiplicative ℤ)
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: