Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Continuity of map of local fields K_v -> L_w coming from number fields #204

Closed
kbuzzard opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #215
Closed

Continuity of map of local fields K_v -> L_w coming from number fields #204

kbuzzard opened this issue Nov 7, 2024 · 2 comments · Fixed by #215
Assignees

Comments

@kbuzzard
Copy link
Collaborator

kbuzzard commented Nov 7, 2024

Let A be a Dedekind domain with field of fractions K, let L/K be a finite separable extension and let B be the integral closure of A in L.

If w is a finite place of L lying over v of K, then the map K -> L "obviously" extends to a map of completions K_v -> L_w. At the time of writing, Andrew Yang has reduced this claim to the assertion about the relationship between the v-adic and w-adic valuations on K, which should easily follow from IsDedekindDomain.HeightOneSpectrum.valuation_comap. The goal of this issue is to check this, i.e. to assume valuation_comap and fill in the sorry in adicCompletion_comap_ringHom in the file FLT.DededkindDomain.FiniteAdeleRing.BaseChange. It should hopefully be a relatively straightforward wrestle with WithZero (Multiplicative ℤ).

@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

claim

@kbuzzard kbuzzard moved this from Unclaimed to Claimed in FLT Project Nov 12, 2024
@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator

propose #215

@kbuzzard kbuzzard moved this from Claimed to In Progress in FLT Project Nov 12, 2024
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from In Progress to Completed in FLT Project Nov 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Completed
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants