-
Repository Context in CD
- current schema only allows OCI-Ref, this needs to be extensible
- Should OCI ref be part of this spec?
-
CTF:
- Should be included in OCM?
-
What are the next step to specify?
- particular types
- Transport, CTF
- Signing
- etc.
- example of local blobs with oci image not good
- better motivation of flow für upload blobs (usually first blobs then component descriptor)
- Terminology section: beside others must describe landscape, component version, snapshot
- add complete component descriptor example
- change technical artifacts to software artifacts
- references in the text to the CD spec for particular entries
- Some chapter with terminology (see https://github.com/openservicebrokerapi/servicebroker/blob/v2.16/spec.md#notations-and-terminology)
- Is Component Version Descriptor better than Component Descriptor because it describes a Component Version?
- Tables for presenting field descriptions (see https://github.com/openservicebrokerapi/servicebroker/blob/v2.16/spec.md)
- Tables for input export params of functions (see https://github.com/openservicebrokerapi/servicebroker/blob/v2.16/spec.md)
- List with all errors and their semantics
- Use-Cases / Scenarios with diagrams for Component Repos
- Clarify that components are not allowed to have two version with the same number but different formats, e.g. v0.1.0 and 0.1.0