Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 21, got 17) #71

Open
SchuirF opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 21, got 17) #71

SchuirF opened this issue Oct 25, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@SchuirF
Copy link

SchuirF commented Oct 25, 2023

Hello,
I first recently had another problem (issue #57 from IndEcol/ODYM) with the ODYM-RECC model, but now this one occurs:

Screenshot 2023-10-27 142657

In connection with issue #57, I had tried to get an old version V2.2 of the model working, until I got the hint that there is already a newer version.
I am now using version V2.5 of ODYM-RECC but I still have the config file from V2.4. Is there a matching config file for V2.5 and if so, where can I find it?

Thanks in advance

@SchuirF SchuirF changed the title IndexError: list index out of range in ModelClassification IT_Aspects ValueError: not enough values to unpack (expected 21, got 17) Oct 25, 2023
@CarrerF
Copy link
Contributor

CarrerF commented Oct 31, 2023

Hi @SchuirF,
I report my answer on the other topic:
"the RECC model relies on the ODYM package (https://github.com/IndEcol/ODYM), which has been updated too. You would need to update it as well.
The dataset has also been extended and reviewed, so I suspect that the version of the dataset you have will not be compatible with the newest code. Please, contact @stefanpauliuk (the owner of the repository) to get access to the dataset."

The function ParseConfigFile from the ODYM package has been updated to include new features, and you would need to update the package to get the full functionalities.

The ConfigFile has also been updated, together with the dataset.

@SchuirF
Copy link
Author

SchuirF commented Nov 3, 2023

Hi @CarrerF,

I understand. Seems like the only solution will be to get access to the latest versions, especially the dataset.
Thanks for your help. I have now contacted the owner of the repository.

Best regards!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants