You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've been examining the RI tool and noticed a discrepancy between the input formats listed in the README and those described in the ri3.cpp file's usage function.
In the README, five input formats are described:
gfd: directed graphs with attributes only on nodes.
gfu: undirected graphs with attributes only on nodes.
ged: directed graphs with attributes on nodes and edges.
geu: undirected graphs with attributes on nodes and edges.
vfu: Sansone et al. file format for labeled directed graphs with node attributes only.
gfd: directed graphs with a single label on nodes.
geu: undirected graphs with labels on nodes and edges.
ged: directed graphs with labels on nodes.
This discrepancy is quite puzzling. Could you please clarify which is the correct set of supported formats? Also, in cases where node labels are entirely absent, can we consider it equivalent to the "direct graphs with one single label on nodes" format as described in the third line of ri3.cpp's usage function?
Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Syz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hello,
First of all, I appreciate with your great work.
I've been examining the RI tool and noticed a discrepancy between the input formats listed in the README and those described in the
ri3.cpp
file'susage
function.In the README, five input formats are described:
However, the
usage
function inri3.cpp
lists the following formats:This discrepancy is quite puzzling. Could you please clarify which is the correct set of supported formats? Also, in cases where node labels are entirely absent, can we consider it equivalent to the "direct graphs with one single label on nodes" format as described in the third line of
ri3.cpp
'susage
function?Thank you for your assistance.
Sincerely,
Syz
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: