You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In most cryptographic papers, the pairing operation in e:G1xG1->G2 takes much longer than the multiplication operation sP in G1. And researchers are working on pairing-free cryptographic schemes. Therefore, pairing operation should be a more time-consuming operation. Why do I use the charm library to measure that the multiplication operation in G1 is greater than the pairing operation?
Figure 1 shows the experimental data tested in Paper 1:hash to points=4.362 > pairing=4.154 > dot multiplication=1.631.
The experimental data of other people also show the same trend as Paper 1: hash to points > pairing > dot multiplication.
Figure 2 shows the data I tested with the charm library. Figure 2 shows dot multiplication=576us > pairing=468us.
I don't know what I did wrong that led to this contradictory result.
Hope to get your help, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In most cryptographic papers, the pairing operation in e:G1xG1->G2 takes much longer than the multiplication operation sP in G1. And researchers are working on pairing-free cryptographic schemes. Therefore, pairing operation should be a more time-consuming operation. Why do I use the charm library to measure that the multiplication operation in G1 is greater than the pairing operation?
Figure 1 shows the experimental data tested in Paper 1:hash to points=4.362 > pairing=4.154 > dot multiplication=1.631.
The experimental data of other people also show the same trend as Paper 1: hash to points > pairing > dot multiplication.
Figure 2 shows the data I tested with the charm library. Figure 2 shows dot multiplication=576us > pairing=468us.
I don't know what I did wrong that led to this contradictory result.
Hope to get your help, thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: