Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract Center of Gravity Estimates #348

Closed
kkurth7 opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 3 comments
Closed

Extract Center of Gravity Estimates #348

kkurth7 opened this issue Nov 28, 2022 · 3 comments

Comments

@kkurth7
Copy link

kkurth7 commented Nov 28, 2022

Hello,

What is the best way to obtain/extract center of gravity coordinates by year? I have found advice including this thread pfmc-assessments/geostatistical_delta-GLMM#12 and the function plot_range_edge, but the former seems related to the deprecated package and the latter did not seem to extract coordinates. Is there a function to accomplish this in VAST?

Are the .rmd single and multi-species vignettes referenced in old materials archived somewhere? If possible, I would like to access them to work through examples with more guidance than the example code. Thank you!

Katherine

@James-Thorson-NOAA
Copy link
Owner

?plot_results references plot_range_index, and output is returned as a tagged element of the returned list by plot.fit_model.

Janelle Morano and I have been translating the example code to a Jekyl website that includes more interpretation here. Does that suffice, or any recommendations?

@kkurth7
Copy link
Author

kkurth7 commented Nov 28, 2022

Thank you for your quick reply, Jim! Can you clarify the units for COG_hat? They don't align with latitude and longitude or UTM locations in the Bering Sea (I'm using the EBS pollock example data) and I can't discern the units from the source code.

The additional information on the Jekyl website is helpful, thank you for the link. Personally, for me as a very new user of VAST, it would be helpful to have a basic example (like the EBS pollock data example code) described with model choices explained and output interpretation. For example, I was watching the Week 8 Lab lecture on the FishStats YouTube channel and heard that multispecies models are too sensitive for science issues such as climate-impact analyses. However, I haven't come across general recommendations like this in the form of a basic example and am unsure what current recommendations are and what only applies to the deprecated package.

@James-Thorson-NOAA
Copy link
Owner

Please email me about the COG units ... they're in the units for fit$data_list$Z_gm and should be in UTM km by default.

default choices for multivariate models are not documented anywhere, but happy to collaborate on expanding Jekyl website or a paper :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants