From c895e87929c506b7d3d5183d72922178ca20e242 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "j.niesser" Date: Tue, 13 Aug 2024 10:01:55 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] remove dot behind equation --- paper/paper.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/paper/paper.md b/paper/paper.md index 72205e0..e36d7cb 100644 --- a/paper/paper.md +++ b/paper/paper.md @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ Since only one of the latter two parameters is strictly required for scaling pur Nonetheless, both peak area and peak height should be supplied to the user, hence the missing one was included as a deterministic model variable and thus still part of the model. In case of the normal and double normal models, the peak height $h$ was used for scaling and the area $A$ was calculated by -$$\tag{10}A = \frac{h}{\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}}.$$ +$$\tag{10}A = \frac{h}{\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}}$$ For skew normal and double skew normal models, the scaling parameter was the peak area. Since the mode and mean of a skewed distribution are – in contrast to normal distributions – distinct, the calculation of the height was nontrivial and ultimately a numerical approximation was added to the skewed models.