You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When computing with intervals (ref. IntervalArithmetic), the order in which an evaluation is performed matters. A simple example is
julia>using IntervalArithmetic
julia> a, b =-1..1, 2..3
[-1, 1]
julia> (a+b)*b
[2, 12]
julia> a*b + b*b
[1, 12]
The example shows that evaluating the factored expression gives a better (tighter) result than using the expanded expression.
Have you considered a "lazy" multiplication of polynomials within this package, such that the expression is hold until asked to be evaluated (i mean expanded symbolically)? A "factor" function would also help, but if it exists, i didn't see it. There is this related issue, but it hasn't received much attention.
To illustrate my use case in a concrete example, consider:
When computing with intervals (ref. IntervalArithmetic), the order in which an evaluation is performed matters. A simple example is
The example shows that evaluating the factored expression gives a better (tighter) result than using the expanded expression.
Have you considered a "lazy" multiplication of polynomials within this package, such that the expression is hold until asked to be evaluated (i mean expanded symbolically)? A "factor" function would also help, but if it exists, i didn't see it. There is this related issue, but it hasn't received much attention.
To illustrate my use case in a concrete example, consider:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: