Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try out Runic formatting #138

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Try out Runic formatting #138

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

DanielVandH
Copy link
Member

Hopefully doesn't break everything

Will have to update the files again after fredrikekre/Runic.jl#15 is addressed

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.89372% with 17 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 94.11%. Comparing base (49a6580) to head (f8b4105).

Files Patch % Lines
...orithms/triangulation/constrained_triangulation.jl 92.10% 3 Missing ⚠️
...c/data_structures/triangulation/adjacent2vertex.jl 92.85% 3 Missing ⚠️
src/algorithms/point_location/jump_and_march.jl 90.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/data_structures/polygon.jl 50.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
...c/data_structures/triangulation/methods/weights.jl 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
src/algorithms/point_location/brute_force.jl 50.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
...entative_coordinates/representative_coordinates.jl 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/data_structures/trees/polygon_hierarchy.jl 90.90% 1 Missing ⚠️
...triangulation/methods/representative_point_list.jl 75.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
src/validation.jl 92.85% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #138      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.59%   94.11%   -0.48%     
==========================================
  Files          94       94              
  Lines        9785     9786       +1     
==========================================
- Hits         9256     9210      -46     
- Misses        529      576      +47     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Comment on lines +7 to +8
LiveServer.servedocs(
;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This look a bit stupid -- The ; should be directly after the opening ( I think.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, that would be better

Copy link

@fredrikekre fredrikekre Jul 21, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed on Runic master

@@ -20,6 +24,7 @@ function safe_include(filename)
end
const session_tmp = mktempdir()


Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Did you manually insert all of these extra newlines? I am guessing this could be another Windows-related line ending bug if not.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't do anything after running the formatter. It looks like the bug since it looked fine originally https://github.com/JuliaGeometry/DelaunayTriangulation.jl/blob/main/docs/make.jl

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should be fixed in JuliaSyntax 0.4.9

update_representative_point=update_representative_point,
store_event_history=store_event_history,
event_history=event_history,
is_true(peek) ? (new_point_x, new_point_y) : num_points(tri);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This shouldn't be indented.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This has been fixed om Runic master

@fredrikekre
Copy link

Try again with [email protected] and Runic master? Probably have to reset the commit first because Runic will not revert some of these changes once they are in the source.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants