-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Split for OGBDatasets #172
Conversation
Tests and some fixes are left. |
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #172 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 33.01% 37.12% +4.10%
==========================================
Files 41 42 +1
Lines 2084 2182 +98
==========================================
+ Hits 688 810 +122
+ Misses 1396 1372 -24
Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. |
The split for heterogeneous datasets with edge-level tasks needs to be addressed. Now that I have had the chance to think about it, I really don't want to change HeteroGraph API. |
Can we add a test with the dataset mentioned in #107 (comment)?
it can be done in a separate PR if it is too involved |
Merge #170 before this |
I think we are in a good position to merge this @CarloLucibello |
The pr adds support for simple graph link split (#107) as well as support for splits in Heterogeneous OGB Datasets.
Need Fixing before merge: #167