Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

multiple problems with binding energy scale #73

Closed
Julian-Hochhaus opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

multiple problems with binding energy scale #73

Julian-Hochhaus opened this issue Jun 26, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working implemented on dev

Comments

@Julian-Hochhaus
Copy link
Owner

But I am a bit confuse, the tail can only be at the left (high BE) but the asymmetry(gamma) parameter only give the tail to the right, toward a low BE.
Screenshot_20230622_212651

Originally posted by @kevinsmia1939 in #71 (comment)
@Julian-Hochhaus
Copy link
Owner Author

Using binding energy scale, FWHMs are negative, areas are off, asymmetry appears on wrong side.

@Julian-Hochhaus Julian-Hochhaus added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 26, 2023
Julian-Hochhaus added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 27, 2023
@Julian-Hochhaus
- removed constraint for asymmetry. negative values are now allowed t…
124e375 
…oo. this enables fitting using binding energy data with asymmetry

- modified calculation of area and fwhm, so that the calculation takes care, if the data are present with regards to binding energy scale or kinetic energy scale
- solves #73 as well as some of the topics discussed in #71
@Julian-Hochhaus
Copy link
Owner Author

Depending on which energy scale is used, one should differentiate between which values should be allowed for the asymmetry.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Something isn't working implemented on dev
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@Julian-Hochhaus