pp

paper/paper.md

@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ The source code for `MolPad` is stored on [Github](https://github.com/KaiyanM/Mo
 
 ![Dashboard Overview: `A`: cluster-level network, `B`: taxonomic-level bar plot, `C`:  a type-level line plot, and `D`: a feature-level table. \label{fig:dashboard}](dashboard.png)
 
-![Example of discovering related patterns with network plot. The shade of edges stands for relevancy. In the brushed area, there are two strongest pairs 1-2 and 7-8. For Groups 1, 7, and 8, the patterns are w-shape with an evident peak at the same time section. For Groups 1 and 2, although Group 1 has higher volatility, they both follow highly overlapped increasing trends.\label{fig:pattern}](pattern.png){ width=110% }
+![Example of discovering related patterns with network plot. The shade of edges stands for relevancy. In the brushed area, Groups 1-7-8 (circled by solid black lines) and 1-2 (circled by blue dashed lines) are strongly linked. For Groups 1, 7, and 8, the patterns are w-shape with an evident peak at the same time section. For Groups 1 and 2, although Group 1 has higher volatility, they both follow highly overlapped increasing trends.\label{fig:pattern}](pattern.png){ width=110% }
 
 ![Dashboard showing Groups 10, 7, 4, and 3 for the bacterial (a.) and Group 4 for the eukaryotic (b.) community. Groups 10 and 4 have decreasing trends for both cheeses, and they all include largely Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. While Groups 3 and 7 have the opposite increasing trends, which include more Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes. Among these, Groups 7 and 4 have the strongest periodicity, suggesting a more reproducible tendency for the corresponding main components. For the eukaryote community, most of the features followed the same stable pattern as in Group 4. \label{fig:cheesecase}](cheesecase.png){ width=80% }