From fda6e494cd527cb91cf0243a2336c042b7f62e6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: KEXIN CHEN <113996265+KexinChen1999@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2024 01:16:27 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] Update documentation.md --- docs/src/documentation.md | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/src/documentation.md b/docs/src/documentation.md index 3b0cbdb..cdc9e48 100644 --- a/docs/src/documentation.md +++ b/docs/src/documentation.md @@ -786,7 +786,7 @@ f = [f1, f2] # Comparison with the original results -In this section, we verify the replication results by comparing our figures with those in the original paper. +

In this section, we verify the replication results by comparing our figures with those in the original paper. We found that the model results for farm size distribution obtained by Julia and Matlab were different. In the original Matlab, the author used the "fsolve()" function to find the numerical solutions of this system of nonlinear equations, thus obtaining the distribution of various variables under optimal conditions. However, in Julia, we use the "nlsolve()" function to solve it. The differences in farm distribution may stem from this. Other graphs and parameters in the output are consistent with those in the original paper.

## Benchmark Economy ### BE Farm Size Distribution from Julia @@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ In this section, we verify the replication results by comparing our figures with # Conclusion -In the original Matlab, the author used the “fsolve()" function to find the numerical solutions of this system of nonlinear equations, thus obtaining the distribution of various variables under optimal conditions. However, in Julia, we use the "nlsolve()" function to solve it. The differences in farm distribution may stem from this. Other graphs and parameters in the output are consistent with those in the original paper. +