-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 135
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactor: make Variant constructor explicit #370
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 3, 2023
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 5, 2023
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 30, 2023
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 29, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 1, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 15, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 16, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
sangelovic
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 24, 2024
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into sdbus::Message, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to the Variant overload, because Variant provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message that Variant object. Variant constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking this Variant converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicit Variant constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This makes the library more robust and prone to user's errors when the user writes an extension for their custom type. In case they forget to implement a serialization function for that type and yet insert an object of that type into
sdbus::Message
, the current behavior is that, surprisingly, the library masks the error as it resolves the call to theVariant
overload, becauseVariant
provides an implicit template converting constructor, so the library tries to construct first the Variant object from the object of custom type, and then inserting into the message thatVariant
object.Variant
constructor serializes the underlying object into its internal message object, which resolves to the same message insertion overload, creating an infinite recursion and ultimately the stack overflow. This is undesired and plain wrong. Marking thisVariant
converting constructor solves these problems, plus in overall it makes the code a little safer and more verbose. With explicitVariant
constructor, when the user forgets to implement a serialization function for their type, the call of such function will fail with an expressive compilation error, and will produce no undesired, surprising results.