You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've found that all UPPERCASE text returns the [{Name}] result for almost every word. For example:
PANKETS 621 LLC - Business Phone: 919-256-2873 (JESSICA)
621 CHAPPELL DR
She would like to have BINS SENT OUT FOR UNITS 101-105
STATED THEY ARE BILLED FOR RECYCLING BUT DON'T HAVE BINS
SHE WANTED TO KNOW IF SHE COULD GET A CALL BACK ABOUT CHARGES FOR RECYCLING
Returns:
{{NAME}} 621 {{NAME}} - Business Phone: {{PHONE}} ({{NAME}})
621 {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
She would like to have {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} 101-105
{{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} DON'T {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
{{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} GET {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yeah, that's the trouble with only using part-of-speech tags from NLP to detect names. PoS tags are flawed in that way. I think that using machine learning for name detection (#16) will be quite a bit better, or possibly using spaCy instead of textblob/nltk (#18).
The good news is that this isn't a terrible default. Although it is redacting a bunch of information that you wouldn't necessarily want to redact (ALLCAPS results in a "false positive"), it is better to be more conservative and not release any names if you can avoid it. I just added the precision label to this issue to be sure to look into this more carefully.
I've found that all UPPERCASE text returns the [{Name}] result for almost every word. For example:
PANKETS 621 LLC - Business Phone: 919-256-2873 (JESSICA)
621 CHAPPELL DR
She would like to have BINS SENT OUT FOR UNITS 101-105
STATED THEY ARE BILLED FOR RECYCLING BUT DON'T HAVE BINS
SHE WANTED TO KNOW IF SHE COULD GET A CALL BACK ABOUT CHARGES FOR RECYCLING
Returns:
{{NAME}} 621 {{NAME}} - Business Phone: {{PHONE}} ({{NAME}})
621 {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
She would like to have {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} 101-105
{{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} DON'T {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
{{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} GET {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}} {{NAME}}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: