Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UX improvements for Stax #138

Closed
bigspider opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed

UX improvements for Stax #138

bigspider opened this issue Apr 3, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ux

Comments

@bigspider
Copy link
Collaborator

List of possible improvements for Stax UX.

  • Display xpub:
    • It would be nice to have a smaller font for an xpub, and make sure it fits on a single screen.
  • Register policy:
    • Remove the "Cosigner registered", registration only happens at the end; ideally, we could try to make it go to the next/previous cosigner just by going right/left (on all devices, not just for Stax), without having to confirm anything explicitly until the end.
    • Smaller font size (or adaptive based on the size of content) would be great.
    • Word wrapping for long policy names with spaces? Currently it splits at the end of the line, regardless if it makes sense to split there or not. (Lower priority, as this might be tricky)
  • Sign_psbt:
    • Can fit everything on a single screen for simple transactions with just one output?
    • Going to the last screen shows a <-- button, but you can only go back to the previous step (showing the fees), which is awkward. Similarly to cosigners, we might want to allow going back and forth without confirming anything explicitly.
@bigspider bigspider added enhancement New feature or request ux labels Apr 3, 2023
@bigspider bigspider added this to the 2.1.3 milestone May 11, 2023
@bigspider bigspider modified the milestones: 2.1.3, 2.2.0 Jun 26, 2023
@bigspider bigspider removed this from the 2.2.0 milestone Nov 7, 2023
@bigspider
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The ones that were feasible were all done in #270.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request ux
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant