Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the newly implemented baseline + DCT does not improve miss rate as expected #1

Open
LevinJ opened this issue Jan 12, 2015 · 2 comments
Assignees

Comments

@LevinJ
Copy link
Owner

LevinJ commented Jan 12, 2015

The detailed issue description is as below:

  1. Baseline detector performace on Inria dataset is 20%
  2. Have the input data decorrelated by adding DCT channels is supposed to reduce miss rate by about 3%, which is about 17%.
  3. But the actual resut obtained from baseline+DCT is 42%.
@LevinJ LevinJ self-assigned this Jan 12, 2015
@LevinJ
Copy link
Owner Author

LevinJ commented Jan 12, 2015

There are quite a few areas which I could look into and figure out why the new detector has this performance gap with what is obervred in “Benenson etc., 2014 EECV” paper. http://rodrigob.github.io/documents/2014_eccvw_ten_years_of_pedestrian_detection_with_supplementary_material.pdf

  1. The timing of performing DCT transformation
    Currently DCT transformation is performed right after the 10 channels (LUV + 6 HOG s + 1 Gradient) are computed and before the shrinking of these 10 channels. maybe the DCT channels needs to be done after the shrinking.
  2. Variants of DCT transformation
  3. Adboost training process
    Maybe the trainig process needs to be accordingly adusted after adding the DCT channels.

@LevinJ
Copy link
Owner Author

LevinJ commented Jan 19, 2015

Have made several attempts to fix this issue:

  1. Adjust the timing of performing DCT by doing it after the shrinking, but this turns to worsen the situation. see here for details. Need to try performing DCT after feature shrinking, as opposed to before the feature shrinking #4
  2. Perform DCT on individual channel, insead of the whole combined big channel. this does improve the rate by about 2%, see here for details. Need to try performing DCT separately on each channel image #5
  3. Debuged into the Adboost training process, and didn't find anything that might cause DCT method not to work. Need to add more traces for adaboost training process to help figure out why dct method does not work as expected #2

Close the exploration on this issue for now, till I have better ideas where to look for the cause.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant