Facilitate use of secured Linux environments for application providers

[kayatate]

+LSB Specification Proposal
+
+Problem Statement:
+------------------
+
+It can be difficult for application providers to install their products on Linux
+systems that have security features turned on compared to those with the
+features turned off. Documentation is needed to guide application providers
+for how to build their applications and installers for systems with SELinux and

• apparmor in use as well as for non-secured systems.
  +
  +(Proposed) Solution:
  +--------------------
  +
  +Create guideline documentation for applications for installing and running within
  +typical SELinux and apparmor environments compared to environments not using them.
  +
  +Solution Discussion Links:
  +--------------------------
  +
  +Solution Rationale:
  +------------------
  +
  +Many customers today want to use their preferred applications in a secure environment.
  +A number of commercial applications are programmed to use more system facilities
  +than are allowed to them in the secured environment. To complete the installation and
  +run successfully, they advise the customer to turn off the security feature. The
  +customer is then forced to make a decision between a more secure environment and
  +using the application. Clearer advice on how to set up applications in secured
  +environments would assist application providers in working within the environment.
  +
  +Distributions Support:
  +----------------------
  +
  +Ubuntu and OpenSUSE ship with apparmor turned on by default.
  +Fedora ships with SELinux turned on by default.
  +
  +Verification Test:
  +------------------
  +
  +Documentation, testing not required
  +

[kayatate]

OK, yet another glitch. Flog me now. That'll teach me to not do a preview before submission.

[mwichmann]

Yes, you got caught by this little note: "Comments are parsed with GitHub Flavored Markdown" (would not have happened if you submitted a file)