Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Sep 6, 2019. It is now read-only.

Ability to fake /proc/cpuinfo and meminfo #1320

Closed
ProfFan opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 8 comments
Closed

Ability to fake /proc/cpuinfo and meminfo #1320

ProfFan opened this issue Feb 12, 2014 · 8 comments

Comments

@ProfFan
Copy link

ProfFan commented Feb 12, 2014

These two are commonly used in device fingerprinting, and many programs explicitly refuse to work if not granted access to them.

@M66B
Copy link
Owner

M66B commented Feb 12, 2014

Can you give examples of applications?

@ProfFan
Copy link
Author

ProfFan commented Feb 12, 2014

@M66B
Mainly Chinese (I do not know about US and(or) other countries) Apps like
Xiami music. They use the cpuid as a unique id of a device.
2014/02/12 23:16 "Marcel Bokhorst" [email protected]:

Can you give examples of applications?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1320#issuecomment-34878094
.

@M66B M66B closed this as completed in 027a14a Feb 18, 2014
@M66B
Copy link
Owner

M66B commented Feb 18, 2014

I have white listed /proc/cpuinfo and /proc/meminfo, since these files do not contain privacy sensitive information.

Please let me know if anything else in /proc should be white listed.

M66B pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 19, 2014
/proc/cpuinfo contains the ID of the CPU
It is not possible to fake this individually

Refs #1320
@adrenalin24
Copy link

How can we deny access to proc/cpuinfo now ?

@M66B
Copy link
Owner

M66B commented Feb 23, 2014

You can white or black list any /proc file using on demand restricting now.

@ProfFan
Copy link
Author

ProfFan commented Feb 23, 2014

But we cannot fake the contents, right?
2014/02/23 11:03 "Marcel Bokhorst" [email protected]:

You can white or black list any /proc file using on demand restricting now.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1320#issuecomment-35822452
.

@M66B
Copy link
Owner

M66B commented Feb 23, 2014

No, that is not possible. I have no solution for that and even I had it would be a headache to support the different flavors of the file.

@ProfFan
Copy link
Author

ProfFan commented Feb 23, 2014

Thank you. Maybe there can be a "advanced" tab for those dangerous things~
2014/02/23 11:30 "Marcel Bokhorst" [email protected]:

No, that is not possible. I have no solution for that and even I had it
would be a headache to support the different flavors of the file.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/1320#issuecomment-35822838
.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants