[Request] onDemand android.intent.action.view

[an0n981]

Add the called link to the on demand popup

[M66B]

Can you please check it out: http://d-h.st/F5w

And this is what I meant by small improvements on XDA ;-)

[an0n981]

perfection yet again

[M66B]

Thanks for testing.

[an0n981]

just one little side effect. had to add android.intent.action.view for my launcher to open the xda tapatalk wodget. Here there are however no whitelist options

[M66B]

You want full control, you got it ;-)
Let me know if this is better: http://d-h.st/Gz3

[an0n981]

Perfect

Regards,

Anonymous

-------- Original Message --------
From: Marcel Bokhorst [email protected]
Sent: February 22, 2014 2:19:29 PM CET
To: M66B/XPrivacy [email protected]
Cc: an0n981 [email protected]
Subject: Re: [XPrivacy] [Request] onDemand android.intent.action.view (#1419)

You want full control, you got it ;-)
Let me know if this is better: http://d-h.st/Gz3

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1419 (comment)

[an0n981]

is white and blacklisting java function a side effect of this change? I love it

[M66B]

What do you exactly mean?

[an0n981]

I am in the process of setting up onDemand for Feedly, in view/load url it calls java functions. These can be individually white and blacklisted

Regards,

Anonymous

-------- Original Message --------
From: Marcel Bokhorst [email protected]
Sent: February 22, 2014 3:47:03 PM CET
To: M66B/XPrivacy [email protected]
Cc: an0n981 [email protected]
Subject: Re: [XPrivacy] [Request] onDemand android.intent.action.view (#1419)

What do you exactly mean?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1419 (comment)

[M66B]

That is by design ;-)

[an0n981]

You should up the price for the pro license to at least 100€.

Regards,

Anonymous

-------- Original Message --------
From: Marcel Bokhorst [email protected]
Sent: February 22, 2014 3:50:39 PM CET
To: M66B/XPrivacy [email protected]
Cc: an0n981 [email protected]
Subject: Re: [XPrivacy] [Request] onDemand android.intent.action.view (#1419)

That is by design ;-)

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1419 (comment)

[M66B]

Just out of curiosity, what would be a fair donation for the pro license in your opinion?

[an0n981]

I'll put it like this, I donated 10€/ license for 3. Given the new features I would be be more than willing to donate at least 25€ per. But I think the majority of people would find this to high given the average price that apps are sold for on the Googl$/Appl$ markets. Maybe something in the range of 10€ would be realistic.

Regards,

Anonymous

-------- Original Message --------
From: Marcel Bokhorst [email protected]
Sent: February 22, 2014 3:56:07 PM CET
To: M66B/XPrivacy [email protected]
Cc: an0n981 [email protected]
Subject: Re: [XPrivacy] [Request] onDemand android.intent.action.view (#1419)

Just out of curiosity, what would be a fair donation for the pro license in your opinion?

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#1419 (comment)

[M66B]

Thanks for your opinion!

[Cerberus-tm]

Wow, so much great work! I think I paid something like € 6 for the pro version? And I had already paid the price for the "Pro enabler" in the Play store, but I didn't care about paying twice. So I personally don't care about a price increase for myself, but I have to say I would definitely not have paid anything over € 10, being poor at the moment. And € 25 sounds like the old days of small Windows applications that nobody would buy. If you price Xprivacy competitively, I'm sure you will sell many more licenses than for € 10+, and your total profit will be higher.

As to the word "donation"...you pay money for a pro license, so it's not really a donation, just the price of the pro version. Maybe remove that weasel word. That said, I have absolutely nothing against having paid for the pro license, it was absolutely worth it, I love it!! And Xprivacy is still improving every day! Great work.

One more thing, is the Pro Enabler thing still in the Play Store, along with the separate payment for the Pro version? I found that very confusing, I accidentally paid twice even though I only wanted one thing. So I would consolidate all that into a single price for just one pro version, no multiple licenses.

[M66B]

Also thanks for your feedback @Cerberus-tm

[M66B]

Yes, the pro enabler is still in the Play store, because removing it would result in a lot of complaints from people that have bought it and still using it and want it to install again for some reason.
See also here: https://github.com/M66B/XPrivacy#FAQ29

[an0n981]

Isn't there a possibility to keep it only for users who have already purchased it?

[M66B]

Not that I know of, it is either in the Play store or not.

[an0n981]

There are certain apps, AFWall beta and Greenify beta come to mind, that can only be seen by users in the beta program.

[M66B]

Yes, but that would not be a solution, because it will still result in complaints for people who didn't subscribe for the beta program (which will be about zero, because there was never such a program for the pro enabler).

[an0n981]

I was not suggesting a beta program, just stating that there are ways to hide apps in the play store. I don't know the conditions needed for hiding the app, just thought it might be something to look into.

[Cerberus-tm]

@M66B Ah OK, I can see why you want to keep it in the Play Store. And I already see that the description contains this:

"...
• See here for how to get other XPrivacy Pro features: http://www.xprivacy.eu/
The import/export enabler will not allow you the fetch crowd sourced restrictions!"

This should already be enough to make most new people not install it if they want the full features. But it could perhaps be made even less confusing if you began the description like this instead:

"If you want only the ability to export/import settings, you can install this Enabler. If you want the full pro features (also including export/import), you can buy the full pro version at http://www.xprivacy.eu for €5/$7."

Then maybe name two or three features of the full pro version.

[M66B]

I have to be careful what I say in the Play store description or Google might remove the enabler from the store, which wouldn't serve existing users either. Any reference to another payment method could be a problem for Google. Nevertheless your suggestion brought me to an idea, I have changed the first sentence to:

"This application enables only the following XPrivacy Pro features:"

I have added the word only, so it is right from the first sentence clear what you will get.

[an0n981]

Have you considered making the XPrivacy Installer available in the F-Droid repo?

[M66B]

That is not a bad idea, but although the idea of F-Droid is okay, it doesn't allow you to sign the apk's yourself. Nevertheless I will think about this, since the installer is only a tool and not XPrivacy itself.

[M66B]

Unfortunately I think the XPrivacy installer doesn't comply to the inclusion policy of F-Droid:

"the software should not download additional executable binary files"
https://f-droid.org/wiki/page/Inclusion_Policy

[an0n981]

It was worth a shot

[Cerberus-tm]

@M66B Ahh yes, I hadn't considered that. Stupid Google. Then it makes sense not to mention the full paid version directly. Your new first line is indeed an improvement, I think this should be clear enough for new users. They will find their way to xprivacy.eu.