You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For the source file located at path analysis/encore/clustering/src/ap.c, the gcc compile optimization level can affect test results in the test_encore.py suite on the Linux ARM64 platform.
At -O1, where we are currently pinned, we get a pass on the suite.
At -O2 and -O3 we get an incorrect result:
_________________________________ TestEncoreClustering.test_clustering_three_ensembles_two_identical _________________________________
self = <MDAnalysisTests.analysis.test_encore.TestEncoreClustering object at 0x7f5a74b750>, ens1 = <Universe with 3341 atoms>
ens2 = <Universe with 3341 atoms>
def test_clustering_three_ensembles_two_identical(self, ens1, ens2):
cluster_collection = encore.cluster([ens1, ens2, ens1])
expected_value = 40
> assert len(cluster_collection) == expected_value, "Unexpected result:" \
" {0}".format(cluster_collection)
E AssertionError: Unexpected result: <ClusterCollection with 42 clusters>
E assert 42 == 40
E + where 42 = len(<ClusterCollection with 42 clusters>)
MDAnalysisTests/analysis/test_encore.py:448: AssertionError
I carefully checked the values of C-level constants like RAND_MAX and the sizes of types used in the source file via sizeof() and found no differences whatsoever between ARM64 and AMD64.
Perhaps this set of observations will be helpful to the low-level gurus for determination of changes needed to preserve performance while improving portability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For the source file located at path
analysis/encore/clustering/src/ap.c
, the gcc compile optimization level can affect test results in thetest_encore.py
suite on the Linux ARM64 platform.At
-O1
, where we are currently pinned, we get a pass on the suite.At
-O2
and-O3
we get an incorrect result:I carefully checked the values of C-level constants like
RAND_MAX
and the sizes of types used in the source file viasizeof()
and found no differences whatsoever between ARM64 and AMD64.Perhaps this set of observations will be helpful to the low-level gurus for determination of changes needed to preserve performance while improving portability.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: