diff --git a/cxrl2024/index.html b/cxrl2024/index.html index a1656a3..a339183 100644 --- a/cxrl2024/index.html +++ b/cxrl2024/index.html @@ -359,91 +359,43 @@

EiCue

-

Qualitive Results

- +

Qualitative Results

+
-

COCO-Stuff

+

Qualitative ablation on each reward model

-
-
- -
-
- Coco label + Qualitative ablation

- Qualitative results of COCO-Stuff dataset trained with ViT-S/8 backbone. +

    +
  • (a): CXRL shows significantly better alignment of the clavicle and costophrenic angle compared to the anchor regarding posture alignment.
  • +
  • (b): CXRL demonstrates improved predictive diagnostic accuracy, closely matching the GT and enhancing clinical decision-making
  • +
  • (c): The multimodal consistency reward ensures that CXRs and reports correspond well, as observed by arrows and text in matching colors.
  • +


-

Cityscapes

+

Qualitative ablation on each reward model

-
-
- -
-
- Coco label + Qualitative ablation

- Qualitative results of Cityscapes dataset trained with ViT-B/8 backbone. +

    +
  • (a): CXRL shows significantly better alignment of the clavicle and costophrenic angle compared to the anchor regarding posture alignment.
  • +
  • (b): CXRL demonstrates improved predictive diagnostic accuracy, closely matching the GT and enhancing clinical decision-making
  • +
  • (c): The multimodal consistency reward ensures that CXRs and reports correspond well, as observed by arrows and text in matching colors.
  • +

+

Qualitative ablation on each reward model

@@ -477,7 +429,7 @@

Evaluation of generated CXRs from multi

COCO-Stuff

- three-evaluation + three-evaluation

The table compares the performance of various methods using three evaluation metrics.

@@ -486,7 +438,7 @@

COCO-Stuff


CXR Quality Table

- ablation + ablation

Comparative analysis of generated CXR quality: (a) quantitatively compares established models using FID and MS-SSIM metrics; (b) evaluates the impact of reward components on FID scores.