We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
While working on ChunkedBuffer:
https://github.com/tzickel/chunkedbuffer
I think it's for calling python methods which are already bound to a Python object, it's faster to do instead of (check the annotated output):
self._bufs_popleft(...)
this:
with cython.optimize.unpack_method_calls(False): self._bufs_popleft(...)
^^- but it's better to leave it though for calling other stuff, like when calling an .find directly.
Also instead of:
self._bufs = collections.deque()
it's less code
from collections import deque self._bufs = deque()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think these are micro-optimizations and it's highly unlikely that they would show a detectable speedup.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
While working on ChunkedBuffer:
https://github.com/tzickel/chunkedbuffer
I think it's for calling python methods which are already bound to a Python object, it's faster to do instead of (check the annotated output):
this:
^^- but it's better to leave it though for calling other stuff, like when calling an .find directly.
Also instead of:
it's less code
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: