comparison with other frameworks -- submit to web frameworks benchmarker

[RMHogervorst]

This sounds like an interesting package but how does it compare to other web frameworks like plumber, shiny and fiery? I think I'd like to know when to choose beakr.

[RMHogervorst]

I see you have answered this about plumber in an issue, but of you don't add it to a readme or vignette people (like me) will keep opening issues with questions 🤷‍♂️

[RMHogervorst]

See #10

[t-wojciech]

I think the authors should add this package to web frameworks benchmarker. There are already four R packages included:

Pos | Language | Framework | Speed (64) | Speed (256) | Speed (512)
107 | r (4.0) | rserve (1.7) | 41 968 | 29 638 | 29 848
189 | r (4.0) | restrserve (0.3) | 2 754 | 2 652 | 2 582
192 | r (4.0) | httpuv (1.5) | 1 912 | 1 814 | 1 736
200 | r (4.0) | plumber (1.0) | 429 | 438 | 432

This article (benchmark) is also interesting: https://restrserve.org/articles/benchmarks/Benchmarks.html

[jonathancallahan]

We created a quick blog post comparing several R frameworks:

https://working-with-data.mazamascience.com/2020/11/11/web-frameworks-for-r-a-brief-overview/