do not go down to subspecies level

[alvarosaurus]

Reported by e-mail: MD Sa 23.01, 08:04, MD Sa 23.01, 03:55

276-274: please combine the two Species for the last two audiograsm that I send on great cormorant and this one – it is actually the same animal and we should not go down to subspecies level

174-177: change species to „Finless porpoise“ do not go down to subspecies level

[alvarosaurus]

Currently, we have subspecies:

• Phoca vitulina vitulina
• Trichechus manatus latirostris
• Neophocaena asiaeorientalis asiaeorientalis
• Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis

[aot29]

Please review pull request @cboelling @miDaehne

[aot29]

Reported by e-mail: MD Sa 23.01, 08:04, MD Sa 23.01, 03:55

276-274: please combine the two Species for the last two audiograsm that I send on great cormorant and this one – it is actually the same animal and we should not go down to subspecies level

174-177: change species to „Finless porpoise“ do not go down to subspecies level

These IDs appear to be not current anymore. The subspecies are listed in the filter pulldown "by species".

[cboelling]

For the time being subspecies should not be offered in the search interface. I think in the current database there are no valid datasets where the texon of the test animal is determined on the subspecies level.

[alvarosaurus]

Yes that's right, there should be no animals determined at subspecies level in the database. However, Browse->Filter->By species shows 2 entries at subspecies level. So there's a problem either with the data in the taxon table (not with he scheme, but with the data) or there's a problem with the query. I don't have access to the database so I can't check. Maybe somebody could send me a database dump by email?

[cboelling]

@miDaehne could you send Alvaro either a database dump or the access information for the database?