We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I noticed that 6-21G parameter of Neon at 1S function is different from ones given in the original paper. https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja00523a008
With the BSE parameter, Ne atom is less bound significantly i.e. 0.8 Hartree. What is the origin of this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I dug into this a little bit and I think you are correct. The discrepancy comes from Gaussian.
Those are the exponents/coefficients for Na, which Gaussian seems to use if you select Ne. Let me see what GAMESS has as well.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
I noticed that 6-21G parameter of Neon at 1S function is different from ones given in the original paper.
https://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja00523a008
With the BSE parameter, Ne atom is less bound significantly i.e. 0.8 Hartree.
What is the origin of this discrepancy?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: