Abstract Updates & Spacing #1
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Some other thoughts that would be useful for me personally would be a dictionary for what ITM, OSINT, etc.. mean. I am unsure of the audience you are wanting to speak to. I did reword and used other relative words like 'which' to 'then'. It is up to you, if you like the edits then groovy, if not, then so be it.
The updates here are 95% with the abstract page paragraph spacing, TOC leaking on abstact page, quotations for quote, spelling corrections of knew to new, and increase of title size of 'Abstract'. The other 5% is on section 2.1.
Furthermore, as you most likely know, References need updated. Overall, great paper and I may need to re-read it more to partially understand some of the lingo and complexity of the mathematics.