You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
During the research software templates session in RSECon24, there were several comments in the mentimeter which I have interpreted as related to the different profiles which are available through the template.
At the moment, 3 profiles are available. We should revise these profiles to make sure:
User profiles cover the different needs of various groups (potentially) using the template.
It is clear to users that they can use the template for different profiles.
It is clear to users when to use which profile.
Mentimeter comments were along the lines: Templates often too detailed. A minimal version would be good; A very small one for mini projects; Should support customisation. Different groups have subtly different needs; Consensus as to what practices should be included can be challenging; Conformance levels - maybe matched to project maturity; There should be well-defined extension points
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It may be worth considering other templates too: if a particular use-case/profile is already covered by another template, we could just refer people to that template instead of trying to cater for everyone.
Checklist before submitting an issue
Some issues which may be related: User profile option-selection #633, Tutorial profile #662 and Profile suggestions #577
Issue details
During the research software templates session in RSECon24, there were several comments in the mentimeter which I have interpreted as related to the different profiles which are available through the template.
At the moment, 3 profiles are available. We should revise these profiles to make sure:
Mentimeter comments were along the lines:
Templates often too detailed. A minimal version would be good;
A very small one for mini projects;
Should support customisation. Different groups have subtly different needs;
Consensus as to what practices should be included can be challenging;
Conformance levels - maybe matched to project maturity;
There should be well-defined extension points
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: