Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Infill tow-level covariates #49

Open
slarge opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Infill tow-level covariates #49

slarge opened this issue Apr 14, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@slarge
Copy link
Member

slarge commented Apr 14, 2022

@sgaichas and I were discussing some of the environmental data collected on the surveys and how they can be used in VAST and other models. As it stands, SST coverage is about 90% and BT coverage is probably a bit lower. Returning a data.frame() with a tow-level OISST and/or GLORYs estimated values would be a huge advantage for models that don't play well with missing covariates (e.g., GAM, VAST, etc).

@kimberly-bastille, @andybeet, and I (link , link, and link) have independently developed some code to aggregate OISST, so it probably wouldn't be a big lift. It might also be a useful action to run in the background.

Probably low priority for the time being, but it could be a useful addition.

@slarge slarge added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 14, 2022
@sgaichas
Copy link
Member

I'll be working out how to merge with the survey diet data (including NEAMAP) in the next couple of weeks. Watch this space for updates.

@andybeet
Copy link
Member

@slucey I think it would be a good idea to process and serve the environmental data from surveys within this package. I think we could process it independently then have an option to join it with the catch.

@kimberly-bastille
Copy link
Member

SST - @atyrell3 and I worked up (ecopull) some gh actions that pull and calculate SST data. Depending on the exact needs of this project it could be pretty easy to port over and edit.

BT - Bottom Temp conversations for the SOE will hopefully be underway this summer/fall (2022) and I think could be useful here as well. Figuring out a workflow that works for both products (+ more) should be included in the conversation.

@slucey
Copy link
Member

slucey commented Apr 15, 2022

Surface and Bottom temp from the survey tows is already included in the get_survey_data pull. We could easily make a stand alone function that only pulls that data then link it up to @kimberly-bastille and @atyrell3 package or other packages to fill in missing data.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants