Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update parameters used for snow cover fraction scheme #48

Merged

Conversation

spencerkclark
Copy link
Member

@spencerkclark spencerkclark commented Jun 17, 2024

Description

This PR updates some parameters used in the snow cover fraction scheme of Noah-MP to be consistent with those in official version 4.5. The commit that added these in the official Noah-MP repository is here.

cc: @kaiyuan-cheng @lharris4

How Has This Been Tested?

I have tested this in a year-long C24 resolution simulation with prescribed observed 2020 sea surface temperature and sea ice and compared the monthly mean surface albedo to ERA5. Quantitatively in terms of land RMSE the differences are marginal, but it does seem to help the albedo bias be less systematically negative.

Before

2024-06-17-albedo-bias-SHiELD-Noah-MP (soil color, iopt_alb = 3, iopt_snf = 3)

After

2024-06-17-albedo-bias-SHiELD-Noah-MP (soil color, iopt_alb = 3, iopt_snf = 3, scffac)

Checklist:

Please check all whether they apply or not

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

These are the parameter values for the MODIS vegetation type dataset in version
4.5 of Noah-MP:
https://github.com/NCAR/noahmp/blob/7ee673e88cc7a4351be329d92809a0c1ce027053/parameters/MPTABLE.TBL#L222-L225

See here for the original commit to the Noah-MP repository:
NCAR/noahmp@03690c5
@lharris4
Copy link
Contributor

I think this looks OK. Thanks.

@laurenchilutti
Copy link
Contributor

@spencerkclark would you like Kai to review this before we merge?

@spencerkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks @laurenchilutti and @lharris4! Yes, it would be great to get @kaiyuan-cheng's approval before merging—it should hopefully be straightforward to review.

Copy link
Contributor

@kaiyuan-cheng kaiyuan-cheng left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good.

@spencerkclark
Copy link
Member Author

Perfect, thanks @kaiyuan-cheng!

@lharris4 lharris4 merged commit fb99cae into NOAA-GFDL:main Jun 18, 2024
74 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants